The tax authorities have partnered with a monitoring committee that’s tasked with the sale of illegal iron ore seized in Karnataka to check indirect tax compliance in transaction of the commodity.
The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs plans to verify whether the export, purchase or sale of illegally mined minerals evaded payment of central excise, customs duty and service tax in the pre-GST regime, a senior government official told BloombergQuint on the condition of anonymity.
The action relates to a case filed in the Supreme Court in 2009 to curb illegal iron ore mining in Karnataka. The central government isn’t a party to the case but is examining the matter since it involves revenue related to the Goods and Services Act, the official said as he isn’t authorised to speak to the media. The tax department is also considering to become a party to the ongoing case in the Supreme Court, the official said.
After a writ petition was filed in the apex court in 2009 seeking ban on illegal mining of iron ore, the court referred the matter to Central Empowered Committee to redress grievances over steps taken by the government. The CEC recommended forming a monitoring committee to supervise the sale of illegally extracted iron ore that was seized during 2006-10—which totalled nearly 29 million metric tonnes.
According to Karnataka Lokayukta—an anti-corruption ombudsman—the value of the illegally extracted iron ore was Rs 12,228 crore, which considered the average price of the commodity and foreign exchange value over the period.
The tax department wants to examine indirect tax implications on transactions, such as:
- Collecting customs duty, central excise and service taxes on the sale, export or purchase of illegally mined iron ore.
- Collecting customs duty, central excise and sales taxes on the export, sale and purchase of legally mined minerals made through monitoring committee in the pre-GST era.
- Whether the customs duty and GST were collected on export, purchase or sale of legally mined minerals made through monitoring committee in the GST regime.
In the pre-GST regime:
- Central excise was leviable on concentrated iron ore.
- Service tax on payments made for leasing rights.
- Customs duty on export of iron ore.
The tax department wants to understand these transactions and verify if the tax liabilities have been discharged, said the official cited earlier.
The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs may ask its intelligence arm—Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence—to approach the Supreme Court to verify indirect tax compliance, the official said.
The official said that it would report compliance and tax collected, if any, in such transactions. The Department of Revenue Intelligence may be asked to check collection of customs duty for illegal iron ore that was exported.
Firms May Be Penalised For Illegal Extraction
The tax authorities also plan to levy a penalty of 100 percent of the value of illegally mined iron ore on which taxes were evaded, said the official cited earlier. The tax department can impose penalty on tax evaded in past transactions, but it can’t raise a tax demand after five years of the relevant date, the official said.
This would be on companies that extracted iron ore beyond their leased areas, where taxes on ore extracted from illegally encroached area would have been evaded. During 2006-2010, there was unchecked export of illegally extracted iron ore from border areas of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, which would have escaped the payment of customs duty.
According to Lokayukta’s report, Vedanta-owned Sesa Goa and state-run KIOCL Ltd., among others, were found exporting iron ore after issue of permits was banned.